3.1 Planning Institutions, their scope and binding character of planning
3.1.1 At national level
At the federal level urban planning is at the competences of RF Government, Ministry of regional development and Agency of construction, housing and public utilities. RF Government is enabled to issue decisions on the working out of federal territorial schemes, to adopt schemes and normative acts. The Ministry of regional development (established at 2004 instead of Gosstroy) is enabled to work out the strategy in the corresponding field, to act as the customer of territorial planning schemes, to issue normative acts. Agency of construction, housing and public utilities has to carry out state service in the field, to act as a customer of different works, to organize state expertise. Both the Ministry and Agency may act as customers of federal programs. Technical regulation is at the competence of the Ministry of technical regulation and metrology.After the collapse of soviet system no one complete document of territorial planning has been issued at federal level. At the same time previously applied methods for issuance the large scale planning decisions and their implementation has became incapable of efficiency. The project of federal law "On foundations of regional development regulation", represented to State Duma at 1999 is since unclaimed. Meantime due to such Russia-wide factors as an appearance of large private companies demonstrating theirs specific territorial priorities, heterogeneous population density and living conditions and demographic decline the problems regarding territorial planning goals, tasks and methods became of utmost importance and serve as subjects of professional discussions. The Concept of regional development, worked out by the Ministry of regional development at 2005 anticipates policy, directed on prior support of "engine-regions", capable to develop economy and to encourage the development process in backward areas. This policy is opposite to current orientation of regional policy, supporting most territories at the expense of few regions-donors (as Moscow, Saint-Petersburg, Tumen oblast, Leningrad oblasts etc.). Well known in Russia professionals (leaders in the field of methodological issues on strategic planning at interregional scale Ph.D. V. Glazithev and Ph.D. P. Schedrovitsky) support the idea of "engine-regions", pointing out, that the lack of human and infrastructure resources in some areas capable for development has became brakes for economic development of all the Russia. They stress, that regions as administrative units should not be authenticated to units of social and economic activity, propose to establish regional agencies of territorial development and to coordinate Russian territorial development instruments with European ones. (http://stra.teg.ru/library/32/1 )
New RF Urban Development Code does not oblige to represent federal planning schemes for public hearings, but obliges to get approvals of regions and municipalities concerned. Before adoption of the federal scheme there must be published the essential part of the document: the location of federal objects and the list of proposed undertakings. All parties concerned may deliver theirs proposals, objections and to appeal in the court decisions of adopted document. After the federal scheme adoption the executive body within three months has to adopt the plan of its implementation, which includes the time-schedule for performance of following projects, for construction works as well as the financial substantiation of plan. The deviation from adopted planning decisions may be sued. Frustrated implementation plan most likely will be followed but by political consequences as the loss of voters confidence to federal public bodies.
3.1.2 At regional level
Regional legal bodies may adopt laws on urban planning and development, not conflicting to federal legislation. There are established regional executive bodies on urban planning, land development and architecture as well as similar commissions formed by representative public structures. Normative acts, adopted by regional government regulate coordination of activities between specialized executive structures, as well as general principles of works (state service performance, control etc.). Orders and arrangements, issued by specialized executive body, specify procedures of activity within each subdivision and interactions with clients or parties under control. Executive bodies responsible for the strategy of territorial development at region are capable to act as customers of territorial planning schemes. The decisions to work up the scheme and to adopt it are to be taken by the regional government.
Some regions (as Chuvashian and Bashkortostan republics, Moscow oblast, Kaliningrad oblast and others) last years (before the adoption of the last Urban Development Code) have adopted theirs territorial planning schemes, including schemes for specified sectors (e.g. Nature protection scheme adopted by Mordovian republic). The implementation of documents adopted should be carried out through performance of regional and interregional programs, working up and adoption of master plans and land planning documentation by municipalities. For example the territorial planning scheme of Kaliningrad oblast lists 14 programs, including two transnational ones. For Moscow and Saint-Petersburg (by Constitution - cities of federal importance) as the document of territorial planning serves master plan. Master plans for Moscow and Saint-Petersburg adopted at 2005 by regional laws.
Urban Development Code does not stipulate the representation of regional planning schemes to public hearings, but obliges to get approvals of federal, regional and municipal bodies concerned. Before adoption of the regional scheme the part of the document must be published: maps with the location of regional objects and list of undertakings. Any party concerned may deliver proposals, objections and to appeal decisions of adopted document in the court. After regional scheme adoption the executive body within three months adopts the plan of its implementation, which includes the time-schedule for following projects, construction works and financial substantiation of the plan. The deviation from adopted planning decisions may be sued. Unperformed implementation plan most likely will be followed but political consequences as the loss of confidence to regional public bodies.
3.1.3 Local level
Municipal authorities are enabled to establish special executive bodies on urban planning and architecture as well as similar subdivisions within representative bodies. Such structures usually exist in municipal districts and cities, meantime smaller settlements have the accomplished structures but seldom. Normative acts issued by specialized department regulate coordination of activities between its subdivisions and interaction of department structures and employee with clients or parties under control. According to the new Code municipal districts covering settlements may work out territorial planning schemes for adoption by respective representative bodies, but till the last time such a schemes are not published. Municipal cities and settlements must produce master plans and last years municipalities of Kazan, Tolyatty, Atchinsk, Lipezk, Staraya Ladoga and some other cities adopted them. Most settlements still rely on old master plans and one may assume that for many small settlements adoption of such document shall be problematic.
The Urban Development Code does not stipulate public hearings on territorial planning schemes for municipal districts, but schemes must get the approval of Federation and respective region if interests of upper levels are concerned, and in all cases must get the approval of municipalities bordering district and municipal settlements within district. Master plans before adoption must be submitted to public hearings. All decisions of municipal planning documents as well as deviations from adopted decisions may be appealed to court. After municipal planning documents adoption the mayor within three months adopts theplan of its implementation, which includes the time-schedule for following projects, for construction works and financial substantiation. The deviation from adopted planning decisions
shall be sued. Unperformed implementation plan most likely will be followed but political consequences.
|
Aspect
level |
planning institutions and theirs normative activity |
planning process |
participation |
Essential (joint) planning document |
sectoral planning A Cultural heritage |
sectoral planning B Nature preservation |
sectoral planning C Infrastructures |
sectoral planning D… Other fields |
|
national level |
RF Government · Normative acts in the field |
· Decision on RF planning scheme preparation · RF scheme adoption |
|
· Territorial planning scheme of federal level |
· RF monuments preservation zones project |
|
|
|
|
Ministry of regional development · Normative acts in the field |
· Molder of Strategy on RF territorial development · Customer of RF planning documents
|
· Any interested parties after scheme publication and before its adoption |
· Territorial planning scheme of federal level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ministry of culture · Normative acts in the field
|
· Presentation of Monuments preservation zones project to RF Government |
· Any interested parties after project publication |
|
· Monuments preservation zones project |
|
|
|
|
|
Ministry of technical regulation and metrology. · Normative acts in the field
|
· Technical regulation (safety standards)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other ministries · Normative acts in the field
|
· RF Planning scheme approval |
|
|
|
· As the thematic part of RF planning scheme |
· As the thematic part of RF scheme |
· As the thematic part of RF scheme |
|
|
regional level |
Regional government · Regional normative acts |
· Decision on the regional planning scheme preparation · Planning scheme adoption |
|
· Territorial planning scheme of regional level |
|
|
|
|
|
Planning body · Regional normative acts in the field |
· Strategy of regional territorial development issuance · Customer of regional planning documents
|
· Any interested parties after scheme publication and before its adoption |
· Territorial planning scheme of region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sectoral executive authorities · Regional normative acts in the fields |
· Approval of territorial planning scheme |
|
· Sectoral plans, maps, regulations
|
· Regional monuments preservation zones project adoption |
· As the thematic part of regional planning scheme |
· As the thematic part of regional planning scheme |
· As the thematic part of regional planning scheme |
|
|
Municipal districts |
Municipal district administration · Municipal normative acts |
· Decision on the district planning scheme preparation · Planning scheme adoption |
· |
· Territorial planning scheme of municipal district |
· |
|
|
|
|
Planning body · Municipal normative acts in the field |
· Strategy of district territorial development issuance · Customer of local planning documents
|
· Any interested parties after scheme publication and before its adoption |
· Territorial planning scheme of municipal district |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sectoral executive authorities · local normative acts in the fields |
· Approval of territorial planning scheme |
|
· Sectoral plans, maps, regulations
|
· Local monuments preservation zones project adoption |
· As the thematic part of district scheme |
· As the thematic part of district scheme |
· As the thematic part of district scheme |
|
|
Municipal city / settlement |
Mayor · Local normative acts · Land planning documentation approval |
· Decision on master plan preparation |
|
· City / settlement master plan |
|
|
|
|
|
· Municipal representative body |
· Master plan adoption |
|
· City / settlement master plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planning body · Municipal normative acts · Land planning documentation control · Building permits issuance · Control over construction and land use |
· Strategy of territorial development control · Customer of master plan performance
|
· Any interested parties before master plan adoption · Conducting of public hearings |
· City / settlement master plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sectoral executive authorities · Municipal normative acts in the field
|
· Master plan approval |
|
· Sectoral plans, maps, regulations
|
· Local monuments preservation zones project adoption |
· As the thematic part of district planning scheme |
· As the thematic part of district planning scheme |
· As the thematic part of district planning scheme |

Belarus
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
Germany
Latvia
Lithuania
Norway
Poland
Russia
Sweden


